Optimize your SAP environment and save costs
Gain insights into how much you can save by reducing your data footprint in your non-production systems.
You could realise potential savings of 50-75% per appliance.
Please complete the form so we can give you a detailed analysis.
Estimated cost savings per HANA device
Production size: | |
---|---|
Non-production size: | |
Number of non-production devices: |
Current and future spend per instance
Current: without DSM
Future: with DSM slicing non-production
Future savings per device
Future consumption vs. current consumption
Current and future spend per instance
Current: without DSM
Future: with DSM slicing non-production
Future savings per device
Future consumption vs. current consumption
Supporting information
Typical DSM Client Sync implementations realise a 75% reduction in diskspace, and therefore memory, compared to a full copy of the Production system. By entering the appliance sizes listed here, we are providing a calculation based on the current pricing for AWS in North America:
AWS Instance | vCPU | Memory | Storage Estimate | Instance + Storage Price (annual) | Quote |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
256 GB r5.8xlarge | 32 | 256 | 640 | $12,304 | Link |
512 GB r5.16xlarge | 64 | 512 | 1,024 | $24,121 | Link |
1TB r6i.32xlarge | 128 | 1,024 | 2,048 | $50,442 | Link |
2TB x2idn.32xlarge | 128 | 2,048 | 3,584 | $78,370 | Link |
4TB x2iedn.32xlarge | 128 | 4,096 | 6,656 | $102,106 | Link |
6TB u-6tb1.56xlarge | 224 | 6,144 | 9,728 | $268,040 | Link |
9TB u-9tb1.112xlarge | 448 | 9,216 | 14,336 | $302,449 | Link |
12TB u-12tb1.112xlarge | 448 | 12,288 | 18,944 | $402,977 | Link |
Actual reductions can vary from company to company, based on industry, age of the SAP system and implementation decisions made along the way. The test systems created with Client Sync behave exactly like a copy of Production, but without any historical date from before the slice date (unless it is referenced by data within the slice). As such, the non-production instances can grow year-on-year at a far slower rate than Production. This means tremendous future savings compared to full copies of Production, where the increased hardware costs are mirrored to all non-production copies.
More information on SAP HANA sizing.
Costings within RISE with SAP are less clear, but predicted savings are likely to be higher than those shown here, given that the management and support costs are also likely to increase based on the total system size of the landscape.